September 27. 2018 – In watching every moment of the Senate hearing to consider the allegations by Dr. Christine Ford against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh the end result is no difference. Nothing is known that was not known already. Nothing was asked that was not asked prior.

Perhaps the only things that was made more detailed was how did the letter by Dr. Ford get leaked to public? Sen. Diane Feinstein publicly blamed Dr. Ford and her friends, claiming that neither she nor her staff leaked the information. Which conflicted with the direct statement of Dr. Ford that neither she nor her lawyers, the only ones to have the letter besides Democrats, leaked the letter. That was embarrassing, but not definitive in any manner.

In addition the polygraph was brought into question. The details that it was done at the last moment, between flights during a funeral, at a time of high emotion and stress, appear to invalidate any results of the 2 question test. But there was no followup on this matter.

The process was incredibly polite to Dr. Ford. It was apparent that only the most gentle of approach was used in speaking to her. But when Judge Kavanaugh spoke, from the start Senate Democrats were vicious and incredulous of every statement.

Yet, with that said, Dr. Ford seemed credible in her belief that she was assaulted and that such assault was by Kavanaugh. At the same time, it was apparent that her belief was not based in any reliable proof but faith in her memory. A memory that was self-admittedly flawed.

It should also be said that Judge Brett Kavanaugh was equally staunch in his belief. He was highly detailed in presenting facts and corroboration. If there was any weakness in his defense of his character and life, it would be his defiance to submit to the only issue that Senate Democrats appeared to desire – a FBI investigation to extend the time for a nomination. A point Kavanaugh brought up several times in the process – and hammered by Senate Republicans once they spoke for themselves.

The following is every tweet, made by M V Consulting President Michael “Vass” Vasquez in watching every moment of the nearly 10 hour process. These statements contain emotions and views of Mr. Vasquez alone and are a live commentary of his views alone:

It seems insulting and crazy for Sen. Feinstein to ask about Ford wanting to be held confidential, when it was likely her (or her aides) that leaked the documents on Ford to the press breaking that confidentiality.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen Leahy has jumped on the FBI bandwagon again – citing that this is normal procedure, but ignoring the violation of procedure that has caused the Hearing in the first place. Besides the well discussed fact, as stated by Biden on others, that the FBI is inappropriate

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

So the hearing has now brought up issue that PTSD is genetic? I never heard that before. Perhaps I'm just ill-informed but that just seems absurd. But it is part of Ford testimony – so according to Gillibrand and Hirono it must be true.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

So far, Whitehouse and Klobuchar are asserting that accusation is all that is needed for assault cases, ignoring that corroboration and defined fact is essential. They say polygraph trumps denial of claimed witnesses. Incredible.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Kkibucghar is now asking why Ford wanted to be confidential. Will Klobuchar ask or address why Dems leaked info and forced Ford public? Nope, moved passed that as it does not help political efforts.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Curious question, Ford says "beach friends" advised her to contact news media and Congress about allegation. But who are these "beach friends"? Are they political? Did they have an agenda? That needs to be asked and answered for clarity for all.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Dems seem unwilling to consider this. Apparently, only women who support their political view are afforded this decree of immutable truth. Case in point Monahan does not get this benefit, nor the several dozen women for Kavanaugh, nor the witness of Ford who denies accusation. https://t.co/mJDYDSBDUM

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

So the polygraph, according to testimony, was done prior or during a funeral. An emotionally extreme event, at the same time an emotional test is done. But that had no impact? On a 2 question test? #KavanaughFord

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen. Coons is lauding women coming forward about sexual assaults, which is commendable. He ignores, as does his Party, the proven allegation of Monahan against Ellison. If the concern is supporting victims, why do they purposefully ignore a victim so close to their home? Politics

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Thus far, it appears question of the Hearing with Ford is if she believes what she has said. But that does not matter. The question is if her word is proof enough, in the face of witness denials and no facts to support her claim, to deny a SCOTUS nomination. Belief is irrelevant.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

The difference of belief and proof – I believe @NYGovCuomo is corrupt, but there is no proof of this. Should Cuomo be arrested? NO. In the same way, Ford has belief, but all facts disagree. That should be the issue today, not emotion. #KavanaughHearings @_talkfm @BinghamtonNow

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen Hirono asks if this is all political. She does not ask if there is any proof. She does not ask why there was a delay. Hirono does not consider that #Kavanaugh should be innocent until proven guilty. The answer is yes this is political for Dems, though not Ford.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Will Sen. Cory Booker ask #Kavanaugh how his family and children are doing through this process? Unlikely as the emotional response to the question is purposefully meant to be directed only for the political objective in play.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen Booker wants to know how Ford feels about the process. Exactly how does this prove the allegation? How does this present or validate proof? In fact, he is playing the public for an emotional plea avoiding the matter at hand, as there is no proof. Again making this political

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen Harris conflates reason why there is a hearing. This is about an accusation, and if there is credible proof to deny a SCOTUS nomination. It is not about belief or personal feelings. But Harris is discussing emotional empathy and denial of presumption of #Kavanaugh innocence.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

So Ford says that the denial by her friend Leland (female) is due to a heath reason? That the refutation by the witness Ford claims is her proof is invalid because the incomplete memory of Ford is superior? How is that logical?

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

With Ford finishing her part of the #KavanaughHearing, the result is no more than what we started with. No proof was offered besides belief. Part of that belief, polygraph was put in question. Denial by witnesses is unchallenged. Motivation from "beach friends" remains unclear.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

How dare Sen. Gillibrand claim that not having unquestioning belief in the incomplete memory of Ford is tantamount to an attack on women in the nation. That is insulting and wrong. This is not about gender politics, or political preferences of Gillibrand.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

I believe @alanderh was correct on 9/26 when he feared the prosecutor asking questions would fall flat. While I understood intent of some questions several statements went without question or were to indirect for the general public I fear. This is a public opinion trial after all

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Wow. #Kavanaugh is coming out in his opening statement with both barrels. He has hit several of his Dem detractors hard. Especially Sen. Feinstein. With a reminder that this affects his family and the nation. Good for him.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen. Feinstein tries to sell the Dem plea for FBI and delay, #Kavanaugh not only clarifies that Hearing is investigation, but that FBI does not make determination. But Feinstein did not clarify why she withheld the allegation.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Prosecutor Mitchell is NOW awake and asking strong direct questions. Where was this in regard to the vague and inconsistent parts of Dr. Ford's admitted memory testimony?

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

So at the first break for #Kavanaugh we see a composed but justly angry detailed response to allegations. There is no quiver in his confidence and answers and no pause in his response to Sen. Feinstein. It would not be surprising to see a similar response to the rest of Dems.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Based on the statements by Durbin, Leahy, and Feinstein it seems every single Dem will ask basically 1 question – can there be an FBI investigation. Though there is no precedent or jurisdiction, but certainly will take up time which has been the documented goal of Dems

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen. Grassley makes to great points, Dems can call for an FBI investigation at any point they wish. Also that Dems could ask the questions they have rather than berate the nominee. Sen. Graham clearly pointed out Dem goals 23 minutes after nomination announced.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen. Cornyn equates the proceedings to McCarthyism with a threat of criminal prosecution. This follows a series of questions about high school nicknames and watching HS football. How is this not character assassination? The ratings for CSPAN will be enormous sadly.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen. Klobuchar equates the Thomas nomination to this one in effort to get FBI. This fails to note that Federal employees were involved in the Thomas nomination and thus FBI was justified. Seems Dems are relying on public;s lack of knowledge of regulations and bad memory

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

It appears that Republicans are giving up on having Prosecutor Mitchell asking questions, and they are returning fire on Dems. Sen. Hatch is following the lead of Graham, and giving good reason why this process has failed more than Thomas nomination.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

In listening to Sen. Coons the realization that Dems are attacking the defendant in a manner that Dems would rail against and denounce if this were a woman. This is not about proof, or inconsistency, its about a political delay and destroying a career.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen. Blumenthal tried to slip in question about Anita Hill. What exactly does that have to do with accusation of Dr. Ford? Or Julie Swetnick? Or Deborah Ramirez? Hill was not involved and thus the question is a trap to create an emotional response without regard to #Kavanaugh

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

In the 8th hour of this Senate hearing the emotions have reached fever pitch as all pretense of seeking truth seems to have been abandoned. Republicans that looked weak in the morning have erupted in afternoon. But thus far all America is losing as no proof of accusation appears

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen. Hirono is back, asking a man to speak! But sadly she only wants to attack the thought of the proceeding as being a circus (created by Dems in their handling of this matter). She also thinks after hours of provocation, that would never dare be done to a woman, emotion is bad

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen. Tillis claim that Dems have ALREADY set up to attack the next SCOTUS nominee – even while #Kavanaugh is in Hearing, is damning evidence of the political nature of the proceeding.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Sen. Feinstein now publicly claims that she did not leak Dr. Ford, and says Ford did it. But Ford stated by oath, she and her lawyers did not do it. Only Dems had documents. So the exposure and damage to Ford is only on Dems!

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

Oh that's low. Sen. Feinstein is now pushing off the leak of the letter on Dr. Ford to press on Ford friends. So Dems are shifting blame to the alleged victim. Really low

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018

@_talkfm @BinghamtonNow In watching every minute of the live Senate Hearing with Dr. Ford and #Kavanaugh today, the conclusion is simply that nothing new was found, and any position held prior likely remains. There is still no proof. And Dems playing politics still seems evident.

— Michael Vass (@MVConsult) September 27, 2018