Why is nationally televised crime not prosecuted?

On July 25, 2016, the Democrat National Committee (DNC) began. Many on the Right, as well as supporters for Sen. Bernie Sanders, were in an uproar because of revelations that under Debbie Wasserman-Schultz the DNC actively sabotaged the potential for any nomination besides that of Hillary Clinton. Essentially, the DNC eliminated the ability of the public to make a honest choice and turned them into Democrat zombies in a narrow hallway. Yet, as bad as that is, the Convention got worse.

This is not about the planned acquiescence to Black Lives Matter (BLM), a splinter group of the Democrat Party best know for hate speech that has led to multiple assassination of police officers across the nation. The Democrat Convention in Philadelphia will stumble into that pandering to emotion tonight, July 26, 2016, with several mothers that claim police incorrectly killed their children taking stage.

A claim that is refuted in many cases by eye witness accounts and CSI evidence. A presentation all the more odd considering that it was Democrats that made the claim that allowing a mother of a victim of violence was pandering – when that mother had a son killed in Benghazi and told by Hillary Clinton nothing could be done and that no one could expect such a turn of events from a video release. It would seem that using tears of a mother are only appropriate when on a Democrat stage, evoking Democrat causes.

But that too is not a crime in a legal sense. Both may morally poor choices, but no law directly disallows this (more investigation into Wasserman-Schultz actions is needed, but the Department of Justice already made clear that Hillary Clinton has a pass on crimes). That said, a crime was on clear display for the nation to see, and apparently the DNC was sure that the public would be too dumb, ill-informed, and misdirected by the majority of news media to notice.

DREAM Act hopefuls
When Astrid Silva and Karla Ortiz spoke to applause at the DNC Convention, it was a criminal offense. Even as Karla Ortiz painted a picture of woe if she and her parents were brought to justice for their active evasion of law, 8 US Code 1324 (iii) was being violated. Karla said,

“Hillary Clinton told me that she would do everything she could to help us.”

That statement, said by an 11 year old to try to ensure hearts would be opened while minds shut down, was sweetly delivered. But it was factually false. Because, as the chief law enforcement agent of the nation – if Hillary Clinton were to be elected somehow – Karla and her family should be arrested and deported for violating the laws that exist, and not what Hillary Clinton and Democrats would like. But long before that potentially dark day for the US legal system, a few more people need to be arrested and prosecuted.

8 USC 1324 (iii) states

“knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;”

For those that don’t get the connection, not only was bringing Karla Ortiz and Astrid Silva to the Convention violating 8 USC 1324 (ii) by transporting them, having them on stage was harboring them in “reckless disregard.” As for the catch-all from Director Comey, intent, well that is pretty clear.

Someone vetted the illegal aliens, to confirm they were in fact illegal. Someone arranged to transport them to the Convention – likely providing housing and likely transporting other family members – after confirming they are in the nation illegally and actively fugitives. Someone put them on stage, and ensured that no member of law enforcement at the event would arrest or turn over these criminals to I.C.E.

That’s active commission of a crime, aiding and abetting a crime, and violation of 8 USC 1324. Every person directly involved in the above should be arrested – if the law applies equally to Democrats as Republicans. Every person that was aware and approved the above is involved in a conspiracy to commit a crime. The evidence was the national televised speech and the very confirmation that they are illegal aliens.

But the major news media has ignored violation of the law, because this was a DNC event. The FBI remains shackled by the DoJ and their subservience to the Obama Administration and Democrats. The signal sent to illegal aliens in the nation, and those hoping to enter the nation in the future, was clear – Hillary Clinton has no intention to follow the law, as long as support for Democrats is given.

No matter what else happens throughout the week, no matter how many attempts to blind voters minds with emotional displays occurs, the fact is that the DNC Convention in Philadelphia is a criminal enterprise. Voters are expected to be ignorant and subservient, in fact it is considered an absolute fact. Because if the FBI absolution of crime did not end the Hillary Clinton presidential run, if the deception against Sen. Sanders and his supporters could not end the run, the American people have no option.

Whether that is true or not will depend on the results in November.

About the Author

Michael Vass
Born in 1968, a political commentator for over a decade. Has traveled the U.S. and lived in Moscow and Tsblisi, A former stockbroker and 2014 Congressional candidate. Passionate about politics with emphasis on 1st and 2nd Amendments.

Be the first to comment on "Why is nationally televised crime not prosecuted?"

Thank you for lending your voice. We appreciate hearing what you have to say.

%d bloggers like this: