Democrats won’t stand for woman vs. DNC

Karen Monahan alleges abuse by Keith Ellison of DNC
Karen Monahan alleges abuse by Keith Ellison of DNC
Rating 3.00 out of 5

As found on Facebook at Vass Political Commentary. Written verbatim on October 1, 2018 at 8:28pm:

Did you hear this,

“An allegation standing alone is not necessarily sufficient to conclude that conduct occurred, particularly where the accusing party declines to produce supporting evidence that she herself asserts exists.”

You might think this was said by a Republican about Dr. Christine Ford. You would be wrong. This is a statement, from investigators connected to the Democrat Party. Reported on Oct 1, 2018 @ 7pm by AP.

Why would Democrats allow this to be said? Why would they say this about Dr. Ford whom they insist must be believed solely because she is a woman. They didn’t. They said this about Karan Monahan – in regard to her accusation of emotional and physical abuse and infidelity against Democrat National Committee Vice-President Keith Ellison.

By the way, Democrat investigators apparently do not consider medical records, text messages, therapist notes, and 911 call as evidence. Items all from the ancient times of 2016. Literally exponentially more evidence than the nearly 4 decades old accusation of Ford – which is absent any evidence or witness corroboration.

So, are Democrats the champions of women as Sen. Schumer claims? Do they believe women without question as Sen. Gillibrand as stated? Should Ellison, a man that Sen. Hirono says should “shut up”, vacate his position in the DNC and withdraw from his election campaign of 2018?

So far, the Dem Party has been silent about this, since the accusation became public and to-date. Similar in many ways that the Dem Party defended former Sen. Al Franken when he was accused of sexual assault – some going so far as justifying no action on the allegation BECAUSE he was a Democrat Senator.

The very sad reality appears to be that the Democrat leadership are more than happy to use women to block a SCOTUS nominee – violating confidentiality in the process – and try to gain mid-term election votes via emotional bankruptcy. But when required to actually stand by the very standards they now claim in the Kavanaugh circus, when it negatively impacts their Party and a potential election, well then the standards change.

Happy New Year

Welcome 2019January 1, 2019
19 days to go.

Be the first to comment

Thank you for lending your voice. We appreciate hearing what you have to say.